‘Political Intimidation’ — Malami Slams EFCC Over Armed Raid on Residence

By Abah Margaret

Former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, has criticised the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) over what he described as a politically motivated raid on his properties.

EFCC operatives on Monday marked a property linked to the former minister in Abuja, following an interim forfeiture order granted by a court.

A viral video circulating online showed Malami confronting the operatives, questioning the legality of their actions and demanding to see the court order authorising the marking of his residence.

Speaking with journalists, Malami described the operation as intimidating and unnecessary.

“There were personnel fully kitted and heavily armed, harassing my immediate family members under the pretext of serving invitation letters,” he said.

He added that the EFCC officials served letters not only at his residence but also at other properties and business premises linked to him.

Malami acknowledged that a court had earlier granted an order on January 6, 2026, concerning his properties, but insisted he had complied with due process.

“To my knowledge, there was a court order granting entry into my properties, but I was given 14 days to respond. We have responded and filed an application to set the order aside,” he explained.

The chieftain of the African Democratic Congress alleged that the actions of the EFCC were politically driven.

“The unfolding events clearly point to political motivation. My earlier detention for over 99 days, far beyond the constitutionally allowed 48 hours, was arbitrary and suggestive of intimidation,” he said.

He further linked the timing of the raid to recent visits by prominent figures, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, suggesting it raised questions about the motive behind the operation.

Despite the development, Malami reaffirmed his political ambition, stating that he would not be deterred.

“The right to vote and be voted for is constitutional. My governorship ambition remains intact, and I will exercise my rights,” he declared.

However, the EFCC maintained that its actions were lawful and in line with standard procedures.

The commission’s spokesperson, Dele Oyewale, said the marking of the property was based on a valid interim forfeiture order.

According to him, the action was intended to notify the public of the property's legal status following the court ruling.