‘My Favourite Thing Is to Take Iran’s Oil’ — Trump Makes Fresh Threat Amid Middle East Conflict

By Abah Margaret

US President Donald Trump has declared that seizing Iran’s oil resources — including control of its strategic export hub on Kharg Island — is among his preferred options, as tensions with Tehran escalate amid the ongoing Middle East conflict.

In a Sunday interview with the Financial Times, Trump said the United States could pursue a strategy akin to its recent actions in Venezuela, where he claimed US forces intend to control that country’s oil sector indefinitely.

Trump’s Own Words
Trump told the FT, “To be honest with you, my favourite thing is to take the oil in Iran ... but some stupid people back in the US say: ‘why are you doing that?’ But they’re stupid people.” He added that options include seizing Kharg Island, a crucial export point through which the bulk of Iran’s oil passes.

“Maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don’t,” Trump said. “We have a lot of options. It would also mean we had to be there for a while.”

Kharg Island handles about 90% of Iran’s oil exports and has become a focal point in the conflict; the US has already struck military infrastructure there without damaging oil facilities — so far.

Conflict and Global Impact
Trump’s remarks come as US forces expand their military presence in the region and oil markets react to the prospect of deeper confrontation. Brent crude, for example, has surged above $116 per barrel, reflecting heightened concerns over supply disruptions.

The Pentagon has deployed thousands of troops, including Marines and units from the 82nd Airborne Division, amid discussions of potential ground operations that could include capturing strategic locations.

Despite the threats, Trump acknowledged the risks of targeting Iran’s oil infrastructure and indicated that indirect talks with Tehran are ongoing, with intermediaries including Pakistani representatives exploring possible pathways to a negotiated settlement.

What It Means
Experts warn that any attempt to control Iranian oil hubs could further destabilise the region, disrupt global energy supplies, and prolong the conflict. The comments have been interpreted as both a bargaining posture and a reflection of the administration’s readiness to escalate if diplomacy fails.